Mostrar mensagens com a etiqueta Energia nuclear. Mostrar todas as mensagens
Mostrar mensagens com a etiqueta Energia nuclear. Mostrar todas as mensagens

quarta-feira, 28 de março de 2018

1979 - "Nuclear accident at Three Mile Island"


At 4 a.m. on March 28, 1979, the worst accident in the history of the U.S. nuclear power industry begins when a pressure valve in the Unit-2 reactor at Three Mile Island fails to close. Cooling water, contaminated with radiation, drained from the open valve into adjoining buildings, and the core began to dangerously overheat.

The Three Mile Island nuclear power plant was built in 1974 on a sandbar on Pennsylvania’s Susquehanna River, just 10 miles downstream from the state capitol in Harrisburg. In 1978, a second state-of-the-art reactor began operating on Three Mile Island, which was lauded for generating affordable and reliable energy in a time of energy crises.

After the cooling water began to drain out of the broken pressure valve on the morning of March 28, 1979, emergency cooling pumps automatically went into operation. Left alone, these safety devices would have prevented the development of a larger crisis. However, human operators in the control room misread confusing and contradictory readings and shut off the emergency water system. The reactor was also shut down, but residual heat from the fission process was still being released. By early morning, the core had heated to over 4,000 degrees, just 1,000 degrees short of meltdown. In the meltdown scenario, the core melts, and deadly radiation drifts across the countryside, fatally sickening a potentially great number of people.

As the plant operators struggled to understand what had happened, the contaminated water was releasing radioactive gases throughout the plant. The radiation levels, though not immediately life-threatening, were dangerous, and the core cooked further as the contaminated water was contained and precautions were taken to protect the operators. Shortly after 8 a.m., word of the accident leaked to the outside world. The plant’s parent company, Metropolitan Edison, downplayed the crisis and claimed that no radiation had been detected off plant grounds, but the same day inspectors detected slightly increased levels of radiation nearby as a result of the contaminated water leak. Pennsylvania Governor Dick Thornburgh considered calling an evacuation.

Finally, at about 8 p.m., plant operators realized they needed to get water moving through the core again and restarted the pumps. The temperature began to drop, and pressure in the reactor was reduced. The reactor had come within less than an hour of a complete meltdown. More than half the core was destroyed or molten, but it had not broken its protective shell, and no radiation was escaping. The crisis was apparently over.

Two days later, however, on March 30, a bubble of highly flammable hydrogen gas was discovered within the reactor building. The bubble of gas was created two days before when exposed core materials reacted with super-heated steam. On March 28, some of this gas had exploded, releasing a small amount of radiation into the atmosphere. At that time, plant operators had not registered the explosion, which sounded like a ventilation door closing. After the radiation leak was discovered on March 30, residents were advised to stay indoors. Experts were uncertain if the hydrogen bubble would create further meltdown or possibly a giant explosion, and as a precaution Governor Thornburgh advised “pregnant women and pre-school age children to leave the area within a five-mile radius of the Three Mile Island facility until further notice.” This led to the panic the governor had hoped to avoid; within days, more than 100,000 people had fled surrounding towns.

On April 1, President Jimmy Carter arrived at Three Mile Island to inspect the plant. Carter, a trained nuclear engineer, had helped dismantle a damaged Canadian nuclear reactor while serving in the U.S. Navy. His visit achieved its aim of calming local residents and the nation. That afternoon, experts agreed that the hydrogen bubble was not in danger of exploding. Slowly, the hydrogen was bled from the system as the reactor cooled.

At the height of the crisis, plant workers were exposed to unhealthy levels of radiation, but no one outside Three Mile Island had their health adversely affected by the accident. Nonetheless, the incident greatly eroded the public’s faith in nuclear power. The unharmed Unit-1 reactor at Three Mile Island, which was shut down during the crisis, did not resume operation until 1985. Cleanup continued on Unit-2 until 1990, but it was too damaged to be rendered usable again. In the more than two decades since the accident at Three Mile Island, not a single new nuclear power plant has been ordered in the United States.

sábado, 23 de abril de 2011

segunda-feira, 14 de março de 2011

Nuclear

Japão pede apoio à Agência de Energia Atómica após explosão em central nuclear

A explosão nuclear na central nuclear de Fukushima representa um desaire para os defensores da produção de energia elétrica por via nuclear.

O mais importante deste acidente é, sem dúvida, o problema das pessoas que podem sofrer diretamente com as suas consequências. Para esses vai a nossa solidariedade. Mas, a necessária discussão sobre a opção nuclear é a consequência óbvia.

Só na União Europeia existem 143 centrais em produção. Se pensarmos no resto da Europa, nomeadamente na Rússia, na Ucrânia, etc., então o número de centrais no continente aumenta substancialmente.

O desenvolvimento não pode ser feito a qualquer custo. Agora que a situação política no Médio Oriente tem traços de incerteza quanto ao futuro das importações de petróleo, os países desenvolvidos têm necessariamente que repensar as suas opções energéticas. Mas, acima de tudo, é preciso uma inspeção a todas as centrais nucleares.

quinta-feira, 7 de agosto de 2008

A energia nuclear é uma opção? - 2


Agora que se voltou a discutir a opção nuclear para Portugal,chega a notícia de mais um acidente em França. De acordo com a informação disponível não foi grave. Mas até quando?

Pode acompanhar aqui o que se passa no mundo com este problema.

quinta-feira, 17 de julho de 2008

A energia nuclear é uma opção? - 1


O Governador do Banco de Portugal, Victor Constâncio, relançou o debate sobre a alternativa nuclear.

Não se fizeram esperar vozes contra e a favor e há, até, quem não ponha a hipótese de haver um debate sobre o assunto.

Nesta altura do "campeonato" é essencial debater. A crise energética, o CO2 e as alterações climáticas devem levar-nos a questionar qual o caminho para a produção de electricidade. Ver os prós e contras. Não esquecer as potencialidades do país em energias renováveis: Sol, vento, água (incluindo o mar) - nada disso nos falta. Os problemas que se têm passado noutros países com o nuclear, como por exemplo a Finlândia.

Os problemas de segurança também devem ser tidos em conta, apesar da evolução das últimas décadas. Nada obsta a que não possam haver acidentes. E os resíduos? O país tem condições para os tratar devidamente?

Vamos debater! Contrariamente a outros, apesar de ser contra, não acho que seja tabu.

Também nos EUA o debate sobre as alternativas energéticas está lançado. Al Gore chegou a afirmar que os Estados Unidos da América estão em risco se não forem repensadas as formas de produção de energia.